Archives

  • 2018-07
  • 2019-07
  • 2019-08
  • 2019-09
  • 2019-10
  • 2019-11
  • 2020-03
  • 2020-07
  • 2020-08
  • 2021-03
  • D Paul R Su M Romain V

    2019-09-28

    [27] D. Paul, R. Su, M. Romain, V. Sébastien, V. Pierre, G. Isabelle, Feature selection for outcome prediction in oesophageal cancer using genetic algorithm and ran-dom forest classifier, Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 60 (2017) 42–49.
    [36] G. Victo, V.C. Raj, Review on feature selection techniques and the impact of SVM for cancer classification using gene BCI-121 profile, CoRR (2011).
    [37] H. Wang, T.M. Khoshgoftaar, A. Napolitano, Stability of filter- and wrap-per-based software metric selection techniques, in: Proceedings of the IEEE 15th International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration, 2014,
    [38] I.H. Witten, E. Frank, Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Tech-niques with Java Implementations, Morgan Kaufmann, 1999.
    A comparison of four common malnutrition risk screening tools for detecting cachexia among patients with curable gastric cancer
    Please cite this article as: Xi-Yi Chen , Xian-Zhong Zhang , Bing-Wei Ma , Bo Li , Dong-Lei Zhou , Zhong-Chen Liu , Xiao-Lei Chen , Xian Shen , Zhen Yu , Cheng-Le Zhuang , A comparison of four common malnutrition risk screening tools for detecting cachexia among patients with curable gastric cancer, Nutrition (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2019.04.009
    This is a PDF Þle of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its Þnal form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
    ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
    Highlights
    · Cancer cachexia was highly prevalent among patients with curable gastric cancer
    · The MST had the greatest ability to detect cancer cachexia among these patients
    ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
    A comparison of four common malnutrition risk screening tools for detecting cachexia among patients with curable gastric cancer
    # Xi-Yi Chen and Xian-Zhong Zhang contributed equally to Regulatory gene study.
    1 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital Affiliated to TongJi University, 301 Yanchang Road, Shanghai 200072, China
    2 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
    3 Department of Endocrinology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
    4 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
    E-mails: [email protected] and [email protected]
    ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
    Abstract
    Objective: There is international consensus regarding the importance of cachexia, although there are no tools for cachexia screening among cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate whether cancer patients with cachexia could be identified using the four most commonly used nutritional screening tools (Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool [MUST], Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 [NRS-2002], Malnutrition Screening Tool [MST], and Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire [SNAQ]). Research Methods & Procedures: Clinical data were prospectively collected for patients who underwent elective radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer in two large centers between August 2014 and February 2018. Patients were also screened using the MUST, NRS-2002, MST, and SNAQ tools. The screening results were subsequently compared to the international consensus diagnostic criteria for cancer cachexia.